Angebotsfrist
04. Dez 2026, 11:00
Geschätzter Wert
60.000.000 DKK
CPV-Code
66100000
NUTS-Region
Nicht angegeben
Zweck
With this tender procedure, Impact Fund Denmark intends to obtain tenders for an integrated global banking solution to consolidate and modernise the banking services currently delivered through a fragmented network of bilateral banking relationships, including custody account services, cash management services, foreign exchange (FX) services, escrow services where required, onboarding, KYC/AML, compliance screening, transaction monitoring and reporting under one coherent operating model.
Verfahren
SELECTION: The contracting entity will invite four applicants to submit initial tenders. If fewer than four applicants meet the suitability requirement and are not excluded, all such applicants will be invited. If more than four applicants meet the requirement and are not excluded, the four applicants with the highest average yearly turnover will be selected. EXCLUSION GROUNDS: Tenderers finding themselves in circumstances as stipulated in sections 135-136 or 137(1), nos. 1, 2 or 6 of the Danish Public Procurement Act are excluded from participating in this tender procedure. PRELIMINARY DOCUMENTATION: As preliminary documentation that the applicant is not excluded under sections 135-136 and section 137(1), nos. 1, 2 and 6 of the Danish Public Procurement Act, and to demonstrate that the applicant meets the minimum suitability requirement set out in the contract notice and tender conditions, the applicant must submit a correctly completed ESPD with the application. OBTAINING DOCUMENTATION: Upon request from the contracting entity, tenderers must show that they are not subject to any exclusion grounds. For Danish tenderers, the documentation requirement may be met by submitting an official certificate from the Danish Business Authority, which must be issued no more than 6 months before the date of submission. For non-Danish tenderers, documentation may be provided by submitting the following: • An extract from a relevant register or a similar document issued by a competent authority showing that the tenderer is not subject to the exclusion grounds set out in section 135(1) of the Public Procurement Act; and • a certificate issued by a competent authority showing that the tenderer is not subject to the exclusion grounds set out in sections 135(3) and 137(1), nos. 2 and 6 of the Public Procurement Act. If the country concerned does not issue the above documents or certificates, or if these do not cover all the grounds for exclusion required, they may be replaced by a sworn statement. If sworn statements are not used in the country concerned, a solemn declaration made before a competent judicial or administrative authority, a notary or a competent professional body in the country where the tenderer is established may be used. The documentation must be issued no more than 6 months before the date of submission. Upon request from the contracting entity, tenderers must show that they meet the minimum requirement specified in the contract notice for financial suitability by providing the tenderer’s three latest annual reports / financial statements. If, for reasons not attributable to the tenderer, the tenderer cannot provide such documentation, the tenderer may show its financial suitability in any other way deemed appropriate by the contracting entity. As a result of Article 5k of Council Regulation (EU) No 2022/576 of 8 April 2022 amending Regulation (EU) No 833/2014 concerning restrictive measures in view of Russia's actions destabilizing the situation in Ukraine, as amended, the tenderer must submit a signed declaration (Appendix 10). Before the award decision, the tenderer to whom the contracting entity intends to award the contract must submit the documentation listed in Appendix 4 (Information Security and Business Continuity Requirements), section 3, including a valid ISO/IEC 27001 certificate (or equivalent certification) with scope statement covering the in-scope services, the most recent SOC 2 Type II or ISAE 3402 report (or an executive summary thereof), and the most recent SWIFT Customer Security Programme attestation. Equivalent documentation will be accepted where the tenderer, for justified reasons, is unable to provide the documentation listed, provided that the equivalent documentation gives the contracting entity a corresponding level of assurance. Failure to provide the documentation may result in the tender being disregarded, cf. section 148 of the Danish Public Procurement Act by analogy.
Lose 1 Los
Tender for contract regarding banking services
With this tender procedure, Impact Fund Denmark intends to obtain tenders for an integrated global banking solution to consolidate and modernise the banking services currently delivered through a fragmented network of bilateral banking relationships, including custody account services, cash management services, foreign exchange (FX) services, escrow services where required, onboarding, KYC/AML, compliance screening, transaction monitoring and reporting under one coherent operating model.
- CPV-Code
- 66100000
- Geschätzter Wert
- 60.000.000 DKK
Eignungskriterien 1 Eintrag
Durchschnittlicher Jahresumsatz
The tenderer must meet the following requirement: Average yearly turnover of minimum USD 3 billion according to the latest three available financial statements. For the purposes of this requirement, “turnover” means the tenderer’s total operating income (gross income), comprising net interest income and net fee, commission and other operating income, as stated in the tenderer’s audited financial statements or equivalent statutory financial reporting. As for consortia, the consortium members combined must meet the requirement. As for tenderers relying on the economic standing of other economic operators, the tenderer and the supporting entity combined must meet the requirement.
Losbezug: LOT-0000
Zuschlagskriterien 3 Einträge
Preis
30 %Reference is made to the tender conditions section 7.
Losbezug: LOT-0000
Qualität
40 %Reference is made to section 7 of the tender conditions and section 4 of appendix 2 (Terms of Reference).
Losbezug: LOT-0000
Qualität
30 %Reference is made to section 7 of the tender conditions and section 4 of appendix 2 (Terms of Reference).
Losbezug: LOT-0000
Ausschlussgründe 21 Einträge
Ausschlussgrund
Has the economic operator itself or any person who is a member of its administrative, management or supervisory body or has powers of representation, decision or control therein been the subject of a conviction by final judgment for corruption, by a conviction rendered at the most five years ago or in which an exclusion period set out directly in the conviction continues to be applicable? As defined in Article 3 of the Convention on the fight against corruption involving officials of the European Communities or officials of Member States of the European Union, OJ C 195, 25.6.1997, p. 1, and in Article 2(1) of Council Framework Decision 2003/568/JHA of 22 July 2003 on combating corruption in the private sector (OJ L 192, 31.7.2003, p. 54). This exclusion ground also includes corruption as defined in the national law of the contracting authority (contracting entity) or the economic operator
Ausschlussgrund
Has the economic operator itself or any person who is a member of its administrative, management or supervisory body or has powers of representation, decision or control therein been the subject of a conviction by final judgment for fraud, by a conviction rendered at the most five years ago or in which an exclusion period set out directly in the conviction continues to be applicable? Within the meaning of Article 1 of the Convention on the protection of the European Communities' financial interests (OJ C 316, 27.11.1995, p. 48).
Ausschlussgrund
Has the economic operator itself or any person who is a member of its administrative, management or supervisory body or has powers of representation, decision or control therein been the subject of a conviction by final judgment for money laundering or terrorist financing, by a conviction rendered at the most five years ago or in which an exclusion period set out directly in the conviction continues to be applicable? As defined in Article 1 of Directive 2005/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 October 2005 on the prevention of the use of the financial system for the purpose of money laundering and terrorist financing (OJ L 309, 25.11.2005, p. 15).
Ausschlussgrund
Has the economic operator itself or any person who is a member of its administrative, management or supervisory body or has powers of representation, decision or control therein been the subject of a conviction by final judgment for participation in a criminal organisation, by a conviction rendered at the most five years ago or in which an exclusion period set out directly in the conviction continues to be applicable? As defined in Article 2 of Council Framework Decision 2008/841/JHA of 24 October 2008 on the fight against organised crime (OJ L 300, 11.11.2008, p. 42).
Ausschlussgrund
Has the economic operator itself or any person who is a member of its administrative, management or supervisory body or has powers of representation, decision or control therein been the subject of a conviction by final judgment for terrorist offences or offences linked to terrorist activities, by a conviction rendered at the most five years ago or in which an exclusion period set out directly in the conviction continues to be applicable? As defined in Articles 1 and 3 of Council Framework Decision of 13 June 2002 on combating terrorism (OJ L 164, 22.6.2002, p. 3). This exclusion ground also includes inciting or aiding or abetting or attempting to commit an offence, as referred to in Article 4 of that Framework Decision.
Ausschlussgrund
Has the economic operator itself or any person who is a member of its administrative, management or supervisory body or has powers of representation, decision or control therein been the subject of a conviction by final judgment for child labour and other forms of trafficking in human beings, by a conviction rendered at the most five years ago or in which an exclusion period set out directly in the conviction continues to be applicable? As defined in Article 2 of Directive 2011/36/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 April 2011 on preventing and combating trafficking in human beings and protecting its victims, and replacing Council Framework Decision 2002/629/JHA (OJ L 101, 15.4.2011, p. 1).
Ausschlussgrund
Has the economic operator, to its knowledge, breached its obligations in the field of environmental law? As referred to for the purposes of this procurement in national law, in the relevant notice or the procurement documents or in Article 18(2) of Directive 2014/24/EU.
Ausschlussgrund
Has the economic operator, to its knowledge, breached its obligations in the field of labour law? As referred to for the purposes of this procurement in national law, in the relevant notice or the procurement documents or in Article 18(2) of Directive 2014/24/EU.
Ausschlussgrund
Has the economic operator, to its knowledge, breached its obligations in the field of social law? As referred to for the purposes of this procurement in national law, in the relevant notice or the procurement documents or in Article 18(2) of Directive 2014/24/EU.
Ausschlussgrund
Is the economic operator guilty of grave professional misconduct? Where applicable, see definitions in national law, the relevant notice or the procurement documents.
Ausschlussgrund
Can the economic operator confirm that:a) It has been guilty of serious misrepresentation in supplying the information required for the verification of the absence of grounds for exclusion or the fulfilment of the selection criteria,b) It has withheld such information,c) It has not been able, without delay, to submit the supporting documents required by a contracting authority or contracting entity, andd) It has undertaken to unduly influence the decision making process of the contracting authority or contracting entity, to obtain confidential information that may confer upon it undue advantages in the procurement procedure or to negligently provide misleading information that may have a material influence on decisions concerning exclusion, selection or award?
Ausschlussgrund
Is the economic operator aware of any conflict of interest, as indicated in national law, the relevant notice or the procurement documents due to its participation in the procurement procedure?
Ausschlussgrund
Has the economic operator or an undertaking related to it advised the contracting authority or contracting entity or otherwise been involved in the preparation of the procurement procedure?
Ausschlussgrund
Has the economic operator breached its obligations relating to the payment social security contributions, both in the country in which it is established and in Member State of the contracting authority or contracting entity if other than the country of establishment?
Ausschlussgrund
Has the economic operator breached its obligations relating to the payment of taxes, both in the country in which it is established and in Member State of the contracting authority or contracting entity if other than the country of establishment?
Ausschlussgrund
Are the business activities of the economic operator suspended? This information needs not be given if exclusion of economic operators in this case has been made mandatory under the applicable national law without any possibility of derogation where the economic operator is nevertheless able to perform the contract.
Ausschlussgrund
Is the economic operator bankrupt? This information needs not be given if exclusion of economic operators in this case has been made mandatory under the applicable national law without any possibility of derogation where the economic operator is nevertheless able to perform the contract.
Ausschlussgrund
Is the economic operator in arrangement with creditors? This information needs not be given if exclusion of economic operators in this case has been made mandatory under the applicable national law without any possibility of derogation where the economic operator is nevertheless able to perform the contract.
Ausschlussgrund
Is the economic operator the subject of insolvency or winding-up? This information needs not be given if exclusion of economic operators in this case has been made mandatory under the applicable national law without any possibility of derogation where the economic operator is nevertheless able to perform the contract.
Ausschlussgrund
Are the assets of the economic operator being administered by a liquidator or by the court? This information needs not be given if exclusion of economic operators in this case has been made mandatory under the applicable national law without any possibility of derogation where the economic operator is nevertheless able to perform the contract.
Ausschlussgrund
Is the economic operator in in any analogous situation like bankruptcy arising from a similar procedure under national laws and regulations? This information needs not be given if exclusion of economic operators in this case has been made mandatory under the applicable national law without any possibility of derogation where the economic operator is nevertheless able to perform the contract.