RA-26-008-GR-Leasing contract official vehicles

The framework agreement, hereafter called the Agreement, shall cover the Gjøvik region ́s need for operational leasing of electric official vehicles. The aim of the agreement is to cover the region's ongoing need for the hire of electric passenger cars (small/medium sized), goods vans (light/medium sized), special vehicles (specially adapted vehicles), stand-by vehicles/fuel vehicles, mainly with a 48 month hire period. The majority of the vehicles will be used for the health and care units, especially within the home services unit. All of the region's units, departments and sections shall be able to lease vehicles under the Agreement.

CPV-Code

34100000

Angebotsfrist

23. Nov 2026, 11:00

Tenderers shall have their tax and duty payments in order (tax, VAT etc.). Documentation requirements: Tax certificate issued by the tax authorities (maximum 6 months old). Foreign tenderers shall submit equivalent certificates from their home country.

Losbezug: LOT-0001

Tenderers shall be a legally established company registered in a company register, trade register or trade register in their country of establishment. Documentation requirements: Company Registration Certificate from the Brønnøysund Register Centre or other valid register statement confirming that the tenderer is registered and legally established. Foreign tenderers submit equivalent certificates from their jurisdiction.

Losbezug: LOT-0001

The tenderer (and any sub-suppliers) who shall carry out work in Norway must meet HSE requirements. Tenderers shall confirm that systematic measures have been implemented to comply with health, safety and environment legislation. Documentation requirements: Completed HSE self-declaration in accordance with public requirements (standard HSE form, cf. the public procurement regulations annex 2). This form shall be signed by the tenderer's top management and it shall be submitted together with the tender.

Losbezug: LOT-0001

Tenderers must have sufficient economic and financial capacity to fulfil the contract. The minimum requirement is credit worthiness without requirement for provision of security. E.g. equivalent credit rating of "A" from Bisnode. Documentation requirements: Credit rating from a certified credit rating agency (based on the most recent annual fiscal figures), not older than 3 months.

Losbezug: LOT-0001

The tenderer shall have a suitable and implemented quality assurance system/management system. The requirement must be fulfilled by the tenderer himself. Documentation requirements: General account of the tenderer ́s quality assurance/management system. If a tenderer is certified in accordance with ISO9001 or equivalent certification schemes, it will be sufficient to fulfil the requirement.

Losbezug: LOT-0001

The tenderer is required to have an environmental management system to ensure environmental consideration in the delivery. Documentation requirements: Certificate that proves a valid environmental management system (f.eks. ISO a 14001 certificate, EMAS registration or Environmental Lighthouse certificate). Alternatively, tenderers can provide a description of their internal environmental management system with an account and policy if formal certification is not available.

Losbezug: LOT-0001

Tenderers shall have relevant experience from assignments or deliveries of an equivalent nature and extent to the assignment in question. 'equivalent' means assignments of the same type, complexity and size, which ensures that the tenderer has the necessary experience. Documentation requirements: Reference list of the most important relevant assignments carried out in the last 3-5 years. The list shall include a description of the assignments, contract value, date/year, as well as the name of the contracting authority/customer for each reference. The contracting authority can contact the references for verification.

Losbezug: LOT-0001

Price

Losbezug: LOT-0001

Quality - offered vehicle models

Losbezug: LOT-0001

Delivery time

Losbezug: LOT-0001

The contracting authority has assessed that climate and environmental considerations in this procurement are safeguarded better through binding requirements in the requirement specifications than by using climate and environment as the award criterion with a minimum of 30 percent weighting, cf. the Procurement Act § 5 b second paragraph. There is a binding requirement for electrical operation for passenger cars. The requirement applies to all passenger cars that are offered and delivered under the Agreement. An absolute requirement ensures that the entire vehicle volume in question is in use free of charge, regardless of which tender is chosen. A relative awarding of tenders with lower emissions is therefore not assessed to give an equivalent or better climate and environmental effect. In accordance with the current regulations, emission standards Euro 6 or better are required for vehicle categories where vehicles with incineration engines can be offered. The contracting authority has assessed the market access to emission-free vehicles against the vehicles ́ intended use, including the necessary range, payload, accessibility and operative stand-by. Based on this, it is not seen as appropriate to have a general requirement for emission free operation for these vehicle categories. The requirements apply for all relevant call-offs under the Agreement and give a direct, binding and verifiable climate and environmental effect throughout the entire contract period. The contracting authority therefore considers that the requirements in total give a better climate and environmental effect than using climate and the environment as the award criteria.

Losbezug: LOT-0001

Is the tenderer in a bankruptcy situation? Specify why, under the mentioned circumstances, one is able to carry out the contract, considering the current national provisions and measures for continuing the business activities? It is not necessary to provide this information if rejection of tenderers in such a situation is obligatory in accordance with the current national law with no exceptions, when the tenderer is still able to carry out the contract.

Is the tenderer in a bankruptcy situation? Specify why, under the mentioned circumstances, one is able to carry out the contract, considering the current national provisions and measures for continuing the business activities? It is not necessary to provide this information if rejection of tenderers in such a situation is obligatory in accordance with the current national law with no exceptions, when the tenderer is still able to carry out the contract.

Is the tenderer himself or a person, who is a member of the tenderer's administration, management or supervisory body or has the competence to represent or control or make decisions in such bodies, by enforceable judgement been convicted of corruption by a verdict handed down not more than five years ago, or a rejection period determined directly in the judgement that still applies? Corruption as defined in Article 3 of the Convention on Combating Corruption, involving European Communities or European Union member states (EUT C 195 of 25.6.1997, s. 1), and in Article 2, point 1, in the Council ́s framework decision 2003/568/RIA of 22 July 2003 on combating corruption in the private sector (EUT L 192 of 31.7.2003, p. 54). This rejection reason also includes corruption as defined in national law for the contracting authority or supplier.

Is the supplier in a situation where he has been forced debt arrangement? Specify why, under the mentioned circumstances, one is able to carry out the contract, considering the current national provisions and measures for continuing the business activities? It is not necessary to provide this information if rejection of tenderers in such a situation is obligatory in accordance with the current national law with no exceptions, when the tenderer is still able to carry out the contract.

Is the tenderer himself or a person, who is a member of the tenderer's administration, management or supervisory body or has the competence to represent or control or make decisions in such bodies, at the time a legally convicted verdict of participation in a criminal organisation by a verdict handed down no more than five years ago, or a rejection period set out directly in the judgement that still applies? Participation in a criminal organisation as defined in Article 2 of the Council ́s framework decision 2008/841/RIA of 24 October 2008 on control of organised crime (EUT L 300 of 11.11.2008, p. 42).

Has the tenderer entered into agreement(s) with other tenderers with the intention of turning the competition?

Is the tenderer aware of breaches of environmental provisions as stated in national law, the relevant notice or procurement documents or Article 18 (2) of Directive 2014/24/EU.

Is the tenderer himself or a person, who is a member of the tenderer's administration, management or supervisory body or has the competence to represent or control or make decisions in such bodies, in the event a legal verdict has been convicted of money laundering or financing terrorism by a verdict handed down no more than five years ago, or a rejection period set out directly in the judgement that still applies? Money laundering or financing terrorism As defined in Article 1 of the European Parliament and Council Directive 2005/60/EF of 26 October 2005 on preventive measures against the use of the financial system for money laundering and financing terrorism (EUT L 309 of 25.11.2005, p. 15).

Is the tenderer himself or a person, who is a member of the tenderer's administration, management or supervisory body or has the competence to represent or control or make decisions in such bodies, at the time a legally convicted of fraud has been convicted of fraud by a verdict handed down not more than five years ago, or a rejection period determined directly in the judgement that still applies? Fraud included in Article 1 of the Convention on protection of the Financial Interests of the European Communities (EFT C 316 of 27.11.1995, p. 48).

Is the tenderer himself or a person, who is a member of the tenderer's administration, management or supervisory body or has the competence to represent or control or make decisions in such bodies, in the event a legal verdict has been convicted of child labour and other forms of human trafficking by a verdict handed down no more than five years ago, or a rejection period determined directly in the judgement that still applies? Child labour and other forms of human trafficking as defined in Article 2 of the European Parliament and council directive 2011/36/EU of 5. 1 April 2011 on the prevention and control of human trafficking and the protection of its victims and for compensation of the Council ́s framework decision 2002/629/RIA (EUT L 101 of 15.4.2011, p. 1).

Is the tenderer in an insolvency situation? Specify why, under the mentioned circumstances, one is able to carry out the contract, considering the current national provisions and measures for continuing the business activities? It is not necessary to provide this information if rejection of tenderers in such a situation is obligatory in accordance with the current national law with no exceptions, when the tenderer is still able to carry out the contract.

Is the tenderer aware of breaches of provisions on working conditions as stated in national law, the relevant notice or procurement documents or Article 18 (2) of Directive 2014/24/EU.

Specify why, under the mentioned circumstances, one is able to carry out the contract, considering the current national provisions and measures for continuing the business activities? It is not necessary to provide this information if rejection of tenderers in such a situation is obligatory in accordance with the current national law with no exceptions, when the tenderer is still able to carry out the contract.

Has the tenderer: a) given grossly incorrect information with the notification of the information required to verify that there is no basis for rejection, or of the qualification requirements being fulfilled, b) failed to provide such information, c) made reservations immediately to present the supporting documents requested by the contracting authority, or d) improperly affected the contracting authority ́s decision process to acquire confidential information that could give this an unlawful advantage in connection with competition, or negligently has given misleading information that can have a significant influence on decisions on rejection, selection or award?

Is the tenderer aware of a conflict of interest as stated in national law, the relevant notice or procurement documents?

Has the tenderer or an entity associated with the supplier advised the contracting authority or in another way been involved in the planning of the competition?

Has the tenderer committed serious errors in professional practice? If relevant, see the definitions in national law, the relevant notice or procurement documents.

Has the tenderer committed significant breaches of contract in connection with the fulfilment of a previous public contract, a previous contract with a public contracting authority or a previous concession contract, where the breach has led to the cancellation of the contract, compensation or other similar sanctions?

Is the tenderer aware of breaches of provisions on social conditions as stated in national law, the relevant notice or procurement documents or Article 18 (2) of Directive 2014/24/EU.

Have tenderers failed to fulfil all their social security obligations in the country where they are established and in their member state, if this is a different country than what he is established in?

Specify why, under the mentioned circumstances, one is able to carry out the contract, considering the current national provisions and measures for continuing the business activities? It is not necessary to provide this information if rejection of tenderers in such a situation is obligatory in accordance with the current national law with no exceptions, when the tenderer is still able to carry out the contract.

Has the tenderer not fulfilled all of his tax and duty obligations in both the country where he is established and in the contracting authority's member state, if this is a different country than what he is established in?

Is the tenderer himself or a person, who is a member of the tenderer's administration, management or supervisory body, or has the competence to represent or control or make decisions in such bodies, in the event a legal verdict has been convicted of acts of terrorism or criminal acts connected to terrorist activities by a verdict handed down no more than five years ago, or a rejection period set directly in the judgement that still applies? Acts of terrorism or criminal acts relating to terrorist activity as defined in Article 1 and 3 of the Council ́s framework decision 2002/475/RIA of 13 June 2002 on combating terrorism (EFT L 164, af 22.6.2002, p. 3). This rejection reason also includes incitement to, participation or attempts to commit such actions as included in Article 4 in the mentioned framework decision.

Is the tenderer himself or a person, who is a member of the tenderer's administration, management or supervisory body, or has the competence to represent or control or make decisions in such bodies, have been legally convicted of offences regarding professional behaviour in defence procurements?

Is the tenderer assessed to lack the reliability necessary to exclude the risk of national security?

The contracting authority shall state that in Norway there are national rejection reasons. These shall be described in the procurement documents. Tenderers must respond to whether they are in one or more of the situations described in the national rejection reasons.