Procurement of two traction transformers for Kassø substation

Banedanmark is procuring two traction transformers of 23 MVA, 165/27.5 kV, designed for two-phase connection within a three-phase system, for Energinet’s 150 kV substation at Kassø. The transformers replace the existing units KT31 and KT32. The Contract covers the Supplier’s design, dimensioning, manufacture, factory testing, transport, unloading, installation, connection, site testing and commissioning, including the associated services, documentation, spare parts, special tools and training, as further described in the Specification of Requirements.

CPV-Code

31170000

Geschätzter Wert

25.000.000 DKK

The candidate’s shareholders’ equity for the last financial year available. The information is to be provided in part IV.B of the ESPD. It is a minimum requirement that the candidate’s shareholders’ equity for the last financial year available is equal to or greater than DKK 0. If the candidate relies on the capacities of other entities, or if the candidate is a group of economic operators, shareholders’ equity is calculated as a total amount for the participating entities for the last financial year available.

Losbezug: LOT-0000

The candidate’s annual turnover for each of the three last financial years available. The information is to be provided in part IV.B of the ESPD. It is a minimum requirement that the candidate’s average annual turnover over the three last financial years available is at least DKK 15 million. The average is calculated as the sum of the annual turnover for the three years divided by three. If the candidate relies on the capacities of other entities, or if the candidate is a group of economic operators, the turnover is calculated as the sum for the participating entities for each of the three financial years. Where the undertaking was set up or started trading less than three financial years before the deadline for submission of requests, the average is calculated over the financial years available.

Losbezug: LOT-0000

The candidate’s solvency ratio for the last financial year available. The information is to be provided in part IV.B of the ESPD. It is a minimum requirement that the solvency ratio for the last financial year available is at least 15 %. The solvency ratio is calculated as shareholders’ equity divided by total assets at the end of the financial year, expressed as a percentage. If the candidate relies on the capacities of other entities, or if the candidate is a group of economic operators, the solvency ratio is calculated as the sum of the participating entities’ shareholders’ equity divided by the sum of their total assets. Each entity must state its shareholders’ equity and its total assets in the ESPD.

Losbezug: LOT-0000

The candidate’s most significant comparable references for the supply of traction transformers designed for two-phase connection, or of other power transformers designed for two-phase connection. The references are to be provided in part IV.C of the ESPD. References for supplies performed within the last ten years before the deadline for submission of requests are accepted, as transformers of the type tendered are supplied in small numbers and have a service life of several decades. The list may contain no more than five references, and each reference may be no longer than 2,400 characters. No minimum requirements are set as to technical and professional ability. The references serve solely as the basis for the selection among the suitable candidates. If more than five compliant requests are received, Banedanmark selects the five candidates which have submitted the most relevant references. In assessing relevance, weight is attached to the following, in the order stated: the comparability of the transformer supplied, where a reference concerning a traction transformer designed for two-phase connection is more relevant than a reference concerning another transformer designed for two-phase connection, which in turn is more relevant than a reference concerning a transformer of another type; then the scope of the supply, including whether it comprised transport, installation, site testing and commissioning, and in particular whether this took place at a substation in operation; and finally the recency of the reference, where the most recent supplies carry the greatest weight among otherwise equally relevant references.

Losbezug: LOT-0000

Reference is made to Section 7 of the Tender Specifications.

Losbezug: LOT-0000

Reference is made to Section 7 of the Tender Specifications.

Losbezug: LOT-0000

Has the economic operator itself or any person who is a member of its administrative, management or supervisory body or has powers of representation, decision or control therein been the subject of a conviction by final judgment for corruption, by a conviction rendered at the most five years ago or in which an exclusion period set out directly in the conviction continues to be applicable? As defined in Article 3 of the Convention on the fight against corruption involving officials of the European Communities or officials of Member States of the European Union, OJ C 195, 25.6.1997, p. 1, and in Article 2(1) of Council Framework Decision 2003/568/JHA of 22 July 2003 on combating corruption in the private sector (OJ L 192, 31.7.2003, p. 54). This exclusion ground also includes corruption as defined in the national law of the contracting authority (contracting entity) or the economic operator

Has the economic operator itself or any person who is a member of its administrative, management or supervisory body or has powers of representation, decision or control therein been the subject of a conviction by final judgment for fraud, by a conviction rendered at the most five years ago or in which an exclusion period set out directly in the conviction continues to be applicable? Within the meaning of Article 1 of the Convention on the protection of the European Communities' financial interests (OJ C 316, 27.11.1995, p. 48).

Has the economic operator itself or any person who is a member of its administrative, management or supervisory body or has powers of representation, decision or control therein been the subject of a conviction by final judgment for money laundering or terrorist financing, by a conviction rendered at the most five years ago or in which an exclusion period set out directly in the conviction continues to be applicable? As defined in Article 1 of Directive 2005/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 October 2005 on the prevention of the use of the financial system for the purpose of money laundering and terrorist financing (OJ L 309, 25.11.2005, p. 15).

Has the economic operator itself or any person who is a member of its administrative, management or supervisory body or has powers of representation, decision or control therein been the subject of a conviction by final judgment for participation in a criminal organisation, by a conviction rendered at the most five years ago or in which an exclusion period set out directly in the conviction continues to be applicable? As defined in Article 2 of Council Framework Decision 2008/841/JHA of 24 October 2008 on the fight against organised crime (OJ L 300, 11.11.2008, p. 42).

Has the economic operator itself or any person who is a member of its administrative, management or supervisory body or has powers of representation, decision or control therein been the subject of a conviction by final judgment for terrorist offences or offences linked to terrorist activities, by a conviction rendered at the most five years ago or in which an exclusion period set out directly in the conviction continues to be applicable? As defined in Articles 1 and 3 of Council Framework Decision of 13 June 2002 on combating terrorism (OJ L 164, 22.6.2002, p. 3). This exclusion ground also includes inciting or aiding or abetting or attempting to commit an offence, as referred to in Article 4 of that Framework Decision.

Has the economic operator itself or any person who is a member of its administrative, management or supervisory body or has powers of representation, decision or control therein been the subject of a conviction by final judgment for child labour and other forms of trafficking in human beings, by a conviction rendered at the most five years ago or in which an exclusion period set out directly in the conviction continues to be applicable? As defined in Article 2 of Directive 2011/36/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 April 2011 on preventing and combating trafficking in human beings and protecting its victims, and replacing Council Framework Decision 2002/629/JHA (OJ L 101, 15.4.2011, p. 1).

Has the economic operator, to its knowledge, breached its obligations in the field of environmental law? As referred to for the purposes of this procurement in national law, in the relevant notice or the procurement documents or in Article 18(2) of Directive 2014/24/EU.

Has the economic operator, to its knowledge, breached its obligations in the field of labour law? As referred to for the purposes of this procurement in national law, in the relevant notice or the procurement documents or in Article 18(2) of Directive 2014/24/EU.

Has the economic operator, to its knowledge, breached its obligations in the field of social law? As referred to for the purposes of this procurement in national law, in the relevant notice or the procurement documents or in Article 18(2) of Directive 2014/24/EU.

Has the economic operator entered into agreements with other economic operators aimed at distorting competition?

Is the economic operator guilty of grave professional misconduct? Where applicable, see definitions in national law, the relevant notice or the procurement documents.

Can the economic operator confirm that:a) It has been guilty of serious misrepresentation in supplying the information required for the verification of the absence of grounds for exclusion or the fulfilment of the selection criteria,b) It has withheld such information,c) It has not been able, without delay, to submit the supporting documents required by a contracting authority or contracting entity, andd) It has undertaken to unduly influence the decision making process of the contracting authority or contracting entity, to obtain confidential information that may confer upon it undue advantages in the procurement procedure or to negligently provide misleading information that may have a material influence on decisions concerning exclusion, selection or award?

Is the economic operator aware of any conflict of interest, as indicated in national law, the relevant notice or the procurement documents due to its participation in the procurement procedure?

Has the economic operator or an undertaking related to it advised the contracting authority or contracting entity or otherwise been involved in the preparation of the procurement procedure?

Has the economic operator breached its obligations relating to the payment social security contributions, both in the country in which it is established and in Member State of the contracting authority or contracting entity if other than the country of establishment?

Has the economic operator breached its obligations relating to the payment of taxes, both in the country in which it is established and in Member State of the contracting authority or contracting entity if other than the country of establishment?

Are the business activities of the economic operator suspended? This information needs not be given if exclusion of economic operators in this case has been made mandatory under the applicable national law without any possibility of derogation where the economic operator is nevertheless able to perform the contract.

Is the economic operator bankrupt? This information needs not be given if exclusion of economic operators in this case has been made mandatory under the applicable national law without any possibility of derogation where the economic operator is nevertheless able to perform the contract.

Is the economic operator in arrangement with creditors? This information needs not be given if exclusion of economic operators in this case has been made mandatory under the applicable national law without any possibility of derogation where the economic operator is nevertheless able to perform the contract.

Is the economic operator the subject of insolvency or winding-up? This information needs not be given if exclusion of economic operators in this case has been made mandatory under the applicable national law without any possibility of derogation where the economic operator is nevertheless able to perform the contract.

Are the assets of the economic operator being administered by a liquidator or by the court? This information needs not be given if exclusion of economic operators in this case has been made mandatory under the applicable national law without any possibility of derogation where the economic operator is nevertheless able to perform the contract.

Is the economic operator in in any analogous situation like bankruptcy arising from a similar procedure under national laws and regulations? This information needs not be given if exclusion of economic operators in this case has been made mandatory under the applicable national law without any possibility of derogation where the economic operator is nevertheless able to perform the contract.