Procurement of modern and innovative waste systems for cottage fields, housing cooperatives, condominiums, joint systems etc. in BIR ́s owner municipalities.

BIR shall enter into a dynamic procurement scheme (DPS) for the procurement of modern and innovative waste systems for cottage fields. Tenderers can apply for admission for the entire lifetime of the scheme. The contracting authority ́s needs and requirements will vary from procurement to procurement, and the tender documentation, requirement specifications etc. will be adapted to each procurement in the scheme. A provisional template for the competition is attached to the competition. The dynamic purchasing system will last for 10 years. The scheme can be terminated and extended if BIR finds it appropriate. A change in duration will be announced. Tenderers can apply for the scheme at any time to be included/prequalified. The value of the dynamic purchasing system in the contract period is estimated to NOK 45 million. The upper financial limit is to be given a value of NOK 100 million excluding VAT. If the upper limit for turnover is reached earlier in the contract period, DPS will be terminated before the stated date.

CPV-Code

44613700

Angebotsfrist

31. Dez 2035, 11:00

Geschätzter Wert

100.000.000 NOK

The tenderer shall be a legally established company. Norwegian tenderers: Company Registration Certificate. Foreign tenderers: Registration certificates in professional registers as determined by legislation in the countries in which the tenderer is established.

Losbezug: MIAL05-2025

Tenderers shall have sufficient economic and financial capacity to be able to carry out the assignments under the framework agreement. Tenderers must as a minimum be credit worthy without security requirements. Tenderers who have significant remarks/clarifications from the auditor on their credit rating can be rejected from the competition. Significant remarks/clarifications are defined as breaches of Norwegian law. ● A credit rating based on the most recent financial figures. The rating shall be carried out by a credit rating company with licence to conduct this service. ● The contracting authority reserves the right to carry out a credit assessment. The financial strength will be assessed in relation to turnover, operating degree, solidity and liquidity. ● If the tenderer has a justifiable reason for not submitting the documentation required by the contracting authority, he can document his economic and financial capacity by presenting any other document that the Contracting Authority deems suitable. If so, this shall be described in the mentioned field in the ESPD form.

Losbezug: MIAL05-2025

Tax and VAT. The tax certificate shall not have significant arrears/amount owed that cannot be explained due to postponements granted by the norwegian tax authorities. The certificate must not be more than six months old. The certificate must not be older than 6 months calculated from the deadline for receipt of tenders. Foreign companies shall present certificates from equivalent authorities to the Norwegian authorities. Description/documentation that explains any arrears.

Losbezug: MIAL05-2025

Tenderers shall have sufficient and relevant experience with the delivery of the requested services. The requirement will be seen as fulfilled on the basis of these 3 requirements (all the requirements must be met) 1. During the last three years the tenderer has delivered semi-buried or buried waste systems that have the digital opening throw-in points system. 2. In the same period have delivered semi-buried/buried and module based waste systems. Module based means that there is division of several chambers for different waste types in each container. 3. During the same period, waste systems have delivered with a hard inner container and mechanical bottom hatch with the use of a mushroom hook lifting system, as well as a sack system with mushroom/1 – hook lifting system. Mushrom is mentioned here as BIR has standardised its lifting and hook system for this product brand. If a tenderer will use other companies to fulfil the requirement, commitment statements shall also be enclosed from the relevant companies that show that the tenderer can use the other company's qualifications. Overview of a minimum of two reference assignments. Information shall be given on: The contracting authority/business customer with contact data, a detailed description of the content of the delivery (technical conditions and operative conditions), value in NOK and the contract period in the number of months. The description of each reference assignment shall be a maximum of 2 A4 pages, font size 10.

Losbezug: MIAL05-2025

The tenderer and accompanying manufacturer shall have a satisfactory quality assurance system that manages how the company safeguards quality. Description of the tenderer's and the manufacturer's quality assurance system. The description does not need to show that the tenderer ́s or the manufacturer ́s system would satisfy an official certification, but show that the system is adapted to the supplier and the manufacturer ́s activities according to the Contracting Authority's needs. The qualification requirement will also be seen as fulfilled if the tenderer and manufacturer can submit certificates issued by independent bodies as documentation that the tenderer and manufacturer fulfil the recognised quality assurance system or standards. In this case it is not necessary to describe the quality assurance system.

Losbezug: MIAL05-2025

The tenderer and accompanying manufacturer shall have a satisfactory environmental management system that manages how the company safeguards relevant environmental considerations. Description of the tenderer's and the manufacturer's environmental management system. The description does not need to show that the tenderer ́s or the manufacturer ́s system would satisfy an official certification, but show that the system is adapted to the tenderer ́s and manufacturer ́s activities according to the contracting authority ́s needs. The qualification requirement will also be seen as fulfilled if the tenderer and manufacturer can submit certificates issued by independent bodies as documentation that the tenderer fulfils recognised environmental management systems or standards. In this case, it is not necessary to describe the environmental management measures.

Losbezug: MIAL05-2025

Is the tenderer himself or a person, who is a member of the tenderer's administration, management or supervisory body or has the competence to represent or control or make decisions in such bodies, in the event a enforceable verdict has been convicted of corruption by a verdict handed down not more than five years ago, or a rejection period determined directly in the judgement that still applies? Corruption as defined in Article 3 of the Convention on Combating Corruption, Involving European Communities or European Union Member States (EUT C 195 of 25.6.1997, s. 1), and in Article 2, point 1, in the Council ́s framework decision 2003/568/RIA of 22 July 2003 on combating corruption in the private sector (EUT L 192 of 31.7.2003, p. 54). This rejection reason also includes corruption as defined in national law for the contracting authority or supplier.

Is the tenderer himself or a person, who is a member of the tenderer's administration, management or supervisory body or has the competence to represent or control or make decisions in such bodies, at the time a legally convicted of fraud has been convicted of fraud by a verdict handed down not more than five years ago, or a rejection period determined directly in the judgement that still applies? Fraud included in Article 1 of the Convention on protection of the Financial Interests of the European Communities (EFT C 316 of 27.11.1995, p. 48).

Is the tenderer himself or a person, who is a member of the tenderer's administration, management or supervisory body or has the competence to represent or control or make decisions in such bodies, in the event a legal verdict has been convicted of money laundering or financing terrorism by a verdict handed down no more than five years ago, or a rejection period set out directly in the judgement that still applies? Money laundering or financing terrorism As defined in Article 1 of the European Parliament and Council Directive 2005/60/EF of 26 October 2005 on preventive measures against the use of the financial system for money laundering and financing terrorism (EUT L 309 of 25.11.2005, p. 15).

Is the tenderer himself or a person, who is a member of the tenderer's administration, management or supervisory body or has the competence to represent or control or make decisions in such bodies, at the time a legally convicted verdict of participation in a criminal organisation by a verdict handed down no more than five years ago, or a rejection period set out directly in the judgement that still applies? Participation in a criminal organisation as defined in Article 2 of the Council ́s framework decision 2008/841/RIA of 24 October 2008 on control of organised crime (EUT L 300 of 11.11.2008, p. 42)

Is the tenderer himself or a person, who is a member of the tenderer's administration, management or supervisory body, or has the competence to represent or control or make decisions in such bodies, in the event a legal verdict has been convicted of acts of terrorism or criminal acts connected to terrorist activities by a verdict handed down no more than five years ago, or a rejection period set out directly in the judgement that still applies? Acts of terrorism or criminal acts relating to terrorist activity as defined in Article 1 and 3 of the Council ́s framework decision 2002/475/RIA of 13 June 2002 on combating terrorism (EFT L 164, af 22.6.2002, p. 3). This rejection reason also includes incitement to, participation or attempts to commit such actions as included in Article 4 in the mentioned framework decision.

Is the tenderer himself or a person, who is a member of the tenderer's administration, management or supervisory body or has the competence to represent or control or make decisions in such bodies, in the event a legal verdict has been convicted of child labour and other forms of human trafficking by a verdict handed down no more than five years ago, or a rejection period determined directly in the judgement that still applies? Child labour and other forms of human trafficking as defined in Article 2 of the European Parliament and council directive 2011/36/EU of 5. 1 April 2011 on the prevention and control of human trafficking and the protection of its victims and for compensation of the Council ́s framework decision 2002/629/RIA (EUT L 101 of 15.4.2011, p. 1).

Is the tenderer aware of breaches of environmental provisions as stated in national law, the relevant notice or procurement documents or Article 18 (2) of Directive 2014/24/EU.

Is the tenderer aware of breaches of provisions on working conditions as stated in national law, the relevant notice or procurement documents or Article 18 (2) of Directive 2014/24/EU.

Is the tenderer aware of breaches of provisions on social conditions as stated in national law, the relevant notice or procurement documents or Article 18 (2) of Directive 2014/24/EU.

Has the tenderer entered into agreement(s) with other tenderers with the intention of turning the competition?

Has the tenderer committed serious errors in professional practice? If relevant, see the definitions in national law, the relevant notice or procurement documents.

Have the tenderer:a) given grossly incorrect information when notifying the information required to verify that there is no basis for rejection, or of the qualification requirements being met,b) failed to provide such information,c) subject to immediately submitting the supporting documents requested by the Contracting Authority, ord) improperly affecting the Contracting Authority's decision process to acquire confidential information that could give this an unlawful advantage in connection with competition, or negligently has given misleading information that can have a significant influence on decisions on rejection, selection or award?

Are tenderers aware of a conflict of interest as stated in national law, the relevant notice or procurement documents?

Has the tenderer or an entity associated with the supplier advised the contracting authority or in another way been involved in the planning of the competition?

Has the tenderer committed significant breaches of contract in connection with the fulfilment of a previous public contract, a previous contract with a public contracting authority or a previous concession contract, where the breach has led to the cancellation of the contract, compensation or other similar sanctions?

Have tenderers failed to fulfil all their social security obligations in the country where they are established and in their member state, if this is a different country than what he is established in?

Has the tenderer not fulfilled his tax and duty obligations in the country in which he is established, and in the contracting authority's member state, if this is a different country than what he is established in?

Specify why, under the mentioned circumstances, one is able to carry out the contract, considering the current national provisions and measures for continuing the business activities? It is not necessary to provide this information if rejection of tenderers made mandatory in accordance with the current national law without the possibility for exceptions.

Is the tenderer in a bankruptcy situation? Specify why, under the mentioned circumstances, one is able to carry out the contract, considering the current national provisions and measures for continuing the business activities? It is not necessary to provide this information if rejection of tenderers made mandatory in accordance with the current national law without the possibility for exceptions.

Is the supplier in a situation where he has been forced debt arrangement? Specify why, under the mentioned circumstances, one is able to carry out the contract, considering the current national provisions and measures for continuing the business activities? It is not necessary to provide this information if rejection of tenderers made mandatory in accordance with the current national law without the possibility for exceptions.

Is the tenderer in an insolvency situation? Specify why, under the mentioned circumstances, one is able to carry out the contract, considering the current national provisions and measures for continuing the business activities? It is not necessary to provide this information if rejection of tenderers made mandatory in accordance with the current national law without the possibility for exceptions.

Specify why, under the mentioned circumstances, one is able to carry out the contract, considering the current national provisions and measures for continuing the business activities? It is not necessary to provide this information if rejection of tenderers made mandatory in accordance with the current national law without the possibility for exceptions.

Is the supplier in a situation where he has been forced debt arrangement? Specify why, under the mentioned circumstances, one is able to carry out the contract, considering the current national provisions and measures for continuing the business activities? It is not necessary to provide this information if rejection of tenderers made mandatory in accordance with the current national law without the possibility for exceptions.