Media Management Services DPS

• A standardised, modular and flexible Media Management service. • Delivered as a dedicated multi-tenant on premise software solution. • With the capability to run in a standard fully virtualised XaaS (Server and Storage) environment with no dependencies on dedicated or specialised equipment. • A license grant that allows for NORDUnet to provide the service to all the Nordic R&E community.

CPV-Code

72000000

Geschätzter Wert

15.000.000 EUR

• A standardised, modular and flexible Media Management service. • Delivered as a public cloud service, with each end-customer organisation having its own administrative domain. • Data processing and storage location(s) to be inside the EU/EEA region.

CPV-Code

72000000

Geschätzter Wert

10.000.000 EUR

“Specific Average turnover” must be submitted for the each of previous two (2) years for concluded fiscal years at the time of the bid response deadline. The economic operator must have an annual turnover of at least EUR 10,000,000.

The economic operator must provide Two references from within the Higher Education community in the European Economic Area, and preferable within the target area of the organisations participating in the procurement. The Two references must relate to new customer implementations, preferable within the previous three years. The references must include the official name of the customer, at least one contact point for the customer including direct phone number and e-mail. The economic operator must state the date of initial delivery to the customer and the Media Management Solution delivered. The economic operator must describe the relevant quantitative volume of the individual references. The quantitative volume is defined as the number of licenses, named or concurrent users. The economic operator must describe relevant qualitative properties of the individual references. The qualitative properties are defined as the inclusion of ongoing delivery of one or more of the following to the customer. 1. Ongoing support of user access to- and availability of the Media Management Solution. 2. Implementation assistance for onboarding. 3. Workshops and training on use of the Media Management Solution. 4. Development of new customer specific features or integrations.

“Specific Average turnover” must be submitted for the each of previous two (2) years for concluded fiscal years at the time of the bid response deadline. The economic operator must have an annual turnover of at least EUR 10,000,000.

The economic operator must provide Two references from within the Higher Education community in the European Economic Area, and preferable within the target area of the organisations participating in the procurement. The Two references must relate to new customer implementations, preferable within the previous three years. The references must include the official name of the customer, at least one contact point for the customer including direct phone number and e-mail. The economic operator must state the date of initial delivery to the customer and the Media Management Solution delivered. The economic operator must describe the relevant quantitative volume of the individual references. The quantitative volume is defined as the number of licenses, named or concurrent users. The economic operator must describe relevant qualitative properties of the individual references. The qualitative properties are defined as the inclusion of ongoing delivery of one or more of the following to the customer. 1. Ongoing support of user access to- and availability of the Media Management Solution. 2. Implementation assistance for onboarding. 3. Workshops and training on use of the Media Management Solution. 4. Development of new customer specific features or integrations.

The Criterion will be weighted between 30-40 %. The actual weight of the criterion is decided by the Contracting Authority for that specific Competition, and will be contained in ITT of each specific Competition.

The Criterion will be weighted between 60-70 %. The actual weight of the criterion is decided by the Contracting Authority for that specific Competition, and will be contained in ITT of each specific Competition.

The Criterion will be weighted between 30-40 %. The actual weight of the criterion is decided by the Contracting Authority for that specific Competition, and will be contained in ITT of each specific Competition.

The Criterion will be weighted between 60-70 %. The actual weight of the criterion is decided by the Contracting Authority for that specific Competition, and will be contained in ITT of each specific Competition.

Is the economic operator in in any analogous situation like bankruptcy arising from a similar procedure under national laws and regulations? This information needs not be given if exclusion of economic operators in this case has been made mandatory under the applicable national law without any possibility of derogation where the economic operator is nevertheless able to perform the contract.

Is the economic operator bankrupt? This information needs not be given if exclusion of economic operators in this case has been made mandatory under the applicable national law without any possibility of derogation where the economic operator is nevertheless able to perform the contract.

Has the economic operator itself or any person who is a member of its administrative, management or supervisory body or has powers of representation, decision or control therein been the subject of a conviction by final judgment for corruption, by a conviction rendered at the most five years ago or in which an exclusion period set out directly in the conviction continues to be applicable? As defined in Article 3 of the Convention on the fight against corruption involving officials of the European Communities or officials of Member States of the European Union, OJ C 195, 25.6.1997, p. 1, and in Article 2(1) of Council Framework Decision 2003/568/JHA of 22 July 2003 on combating corruption in the private sector (OJ L 192, 31.7.2003, p. 54). This exclusion ground also includes corruption as defined in the national law of the contracting authority (contracting entity) or the economic operator. "

Is the economic operator in arrangement with creditors? This information needs not be given if exclusion of economic operators in this case has been made mandatory under the applicable national law without any possibility of derogation where the economic operator is nevertheless able to perform the contract.

Has the economic operator itself or any person who is a member of its administrative, management or supervisory body or has powers of representation, decision or control therein been the subject of a conviction by final judgment for participation in a criminal organisation, by a conviction rendered at the most five years ago or in which an exclusion period set out directly in the conviction continues to be applicable? As defined in Article 2 of Council Framework Decision 2008/841/JHA of 24 October 2008 on the fight against organised crime (OJ L 300, 11.11.2008, p. 42).

Has the economic operator entered into agreements with other economic operators aimed at distorting competition?

Has the economic operator itself or any person who is a member of its administrative, management or supervisory body or has powers of representation, decision or control therein been the subject of a conviction by final judgment for money laundering or terrorist financing, by a conviction rendered at the most five years ago or in which an exclusion period set out directly in the conviction continues to be applicable? As defined in Article 1 of Directive 2005/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 October 2005 on the prevention of the use of the financial system for the purpose of money laundering and terrorist financing (OJ L 309, 25.11.2005, p. 15).

Has the economic operator itself or any person who is a member of its administrative, management or supervisory body or has powers of representation, decision or control therein been the subject of a conviction by final judgment for fraud, by a conviction rendered at the most five years ago or in which an exclusion period set out directly in the conviction continues to be applicable? Within the meaning of Article 1 of the Convention on the protection of the European Communities' financial interests (OJ C 316, 27.11.1995, p. 48).

Has the economic operator itself or any person who is a member of its administrative, management or supervisory body or has powers of representation, decision or control therein been the subject of a conviction by final judgment for child labour and other forms of trafficking in human beings, by a conviction rendered at the most five years ago or in which an exclusion period set out directly in the conviction continues to be applicable? As defined in Article 2 of Directive 2011/36/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 April 2011 on preventing and combating trafficking in human beings and protecting its victims, and replacing Council Framework Decision 2002/629/JHA (OJ L 101, 15.4.2011, p. 1).

Is the economic operator the subject of insolvency or winding-up? This information needs not be given if exclusion of economic operators in this case has been made mandatory under the applicable national law without any possibility of derogation where the economic operator is nevertheless able to perform the contract.

Are the assets of the economic operator being administered by a liquidator or by the court? This information needs not be given if exclusion of economic operators in this case has been made mandatory under the applicable national law without any possibility of derogation where the economic operator is nevertheless able to perform the contract.

Can the economic operator confirm that: a) It has been guilty of serious misrepresentation in supplying the information required for the verification of the absence of grounds for exclusion or the fulfilment of the selection criteria, b) It has withheld such information, c) It has not been able, without delay, to submit the supporting documents required by a contracting authority or contracting entity, and d) It has undertaken to unduly influence the decision making process of the contracting authority or contracting entity, to obtain confidential information that may confer upon it undue advantages in the procurement procedure or to negligently provide misleading information that may have a material influence on decisions concerning exclusion, selection or award?

Is the economic operator aware of any conflict of interest, as indicated in national law, the relevant notice or the procurement documents due to its participation in the procurement procedure?

Has the economic operator or an undertaking related to it advised the contracting authority or contracting entity or otherwise been involved in the preparation of the procurement procedure?

Is the economic operator guilty of grave professional misconduct? Where applicable, see definitions in national law, the relevant notice or the procurement documents.

Has the economic operator breached its obligations relating to the payment social security contributions, both in the country in which it is established and in Member State of the contracting authority or contracting entity if other than the country of establishment?

Are the business activities of the economic operator suspended? This information needs not be given if exclusion of economic operators in this case has been made mandatory under the applicable national law without any possibility of derogation where the economic operator is nevertheless able to perform the contract.

Has the economic operator breached its obligations relating to the payment of taxes, both in the country in which it is established and in Member State of the contracting authority or contracting entity if other than the country of establishment?

Has the economic operator itself or any person who is a member of its administrative, management or supervisory body or has powers of representation, decision or control therein been the subject of a conviction by final judgment for terrorist offences or offences linked to terrorist activities, by a conviction rendered at the most five years ago or in which an exclusion period set out directly in the conviction continues to be applicable? As defined in Articles 1 and 3 of Council Framework Decision of 13 June 2002 on combating terrorism (OJ L 164, 22.6.2002, p. 3). This exclusion ground also includes inciting or aiding or abetting or attempting to commit an offence, as referred to in Article 4 of that Framework Decision.