Framework agreements for carpentry services

Description of the sub-contract - Carpentry services in the North - Troms This sub-contract is for carpentry services for Troms county ́s building in Nord-Troms. Buildings included in the sub-contract are stated in Annex E - List of Operations Nord-Troms. Tenderers shall fill in a separate tender form for Nord-Troms for this sub-contract. The tender form consists of three sub forms for pricing hourly rates, materials and transport. Transport shall be priced separately for the buildings that are included in this sub-area. The estimated value of the lot is NOK 1,900,000 excluding VAT. The maximum value is NOK 2,500,000 excluding VAT.

CPV-Code

50700000

Angebotsfrist

20. Nov 2026, 12:00

Geschätzter Wert

1.900.000 NOK

Description of the sub-contract - Carpentry services in the Middle - Troms This sub-contract is for carpentry services for Troms county ́s building in Midt-Troms. Buildings included in the sub-contract are stated in Annex E - Business Overview Mid-Troms. Tenderers shall fill in a separate tender form for Midt-Troms for this sub-contract. The tender form consists of three sub forms for pricing hourly rates, materials and transport. Transport shall be priced separately for the buildings that are included in this sub-area. The estimated value of the lot is NOK 9,600,000 excluding VAT. The maximum value is NOK 12,500,000 excluding VAT.

CPV-Code

50700000

Angebotsfrist

20. Nov 2026, 12:00

Geschätzter Wert

9.600.000 NOK

Description of the sub-contract - Carpentry services in Tromsø - the region This sub-contract is for carpentry services for Troms county ́s buildings in the Tromsø region. Buildings included in the sub-contract are stated in Annex E - List of Entities in Tromsø region. Tenderers shall fill in a separate tender form for the Tromsø region for this sub-contract. The tender form consists of three sub forms for pricing hourly rates, materials and transport. Transport shall be priced separately for the buildings that are included in this sub-area. The estimated value of the lot is NOK 16,800,000 excluding VAT. The maximum value is NOK 21,000,000 excluding VAT.

CPV-Code

50700000

Angebotsfrist

20. Nov 2026, 12:00

Geschätzter Wert

16.800.000 NOK

Description of the sub-contract - Carpentry services in the South - Troms This sub-contract is for carpentry services for Troms county ́s building in Sør-Troms. Buildings included in the sub-contract are stated in Annex E - List of Operations Sør - Troms. Tenderers shall fill in a separate tender form for Sør-Troms for this sub-contract. The tender form consists of three sub forms for pricing hourly rates, materials and transport. Transport shall be priced separately for the buildings that are included in this sub-area. The estimated value of the lot is NOK 6,400,000 excluding VAT. The maximum value is NOK 8,300,000 excluding VAT.

CPV-Code

50700000

Angebotsfrist

20. Nov 2026, 12:00

Geschätzter Wert

6.400.000 NOK

<p><strong>Evaluation of implementation ability and follow-up assignments: </strong></p><p>. Requirement 3.6 will be evaluated based on the tenderer ́s response. An overall assessment will be made where the contracting authority will give a point score on a scale from 1 to 10.</p><p></p><p>Character scale:<br>1 points - As far as fulfilled the minimum to achieve character<br>2-3 points - Very much weaker than the best offer<br>4-5 points - Much weaker than the best offer<br>6-7 points - Weaker than that best offer<br>8-9 points - Close to the best offer, but with some weaknesses<br>10 points - The best offer</p>

Losbezug: cmv5020vr000a06kxt2w2nk8k

<p><strong>Evaluation emission free transport: </strong><br>It is the share of emission free vehicles and the period (the time) these will be used in the fixed contract period of 2 years, which will form the basis of the points determination.<br>Man a maximum of 10 points can be achieved on this environmental criterion. This can only be achieved if the tenderer only uses emission-free vehicles in the first 2 contract years.</p><p>For further information on the evaluation of the criteria, See the Annex - List of vehicles that the tenderer achieves will not be normalised.>< < </p><p>><br></p><p><strong>Evalence and reuse: </strong></p><p>Use and reuse will be evaluated based on the tenderer ́s response. An overall assessment will be made where the contracting authority will give a score on a scale from 1 to 10.<br></p><p>Character scale for assessing reuse and reuse:<br>1 points - As far as fulfilled the minimum to achieve character<br>2-3 points - Very much weaker than the best offer<br>4-5 points - Much weaker than the best offer<br>6-7 points - Weaker than the best offer<br>8-9 points - Close to the best offer, But with some weaknesses<br>10 points - The best tender</p><p><br></p><p><strong>Evalence degree of sorting:</strong></p><p>The supplier who offers a 100% sorting degree will get 10 points. The tenderer who only offers the minimum requirement of 75% will get 0 points. <br><br>Contractors will get points according to the following formula: Score = 10p x (See-75)/25 <br>what See is the degree of sorting that the tenderer offers.</p><p><><p><p><pbr></p><p><strong>Evaluation of environmental declarations (EPD):</strong></p><p>Products with approved EPD will be multiplied by the estimated annual volume, and then summed to a total sum.</p><ul class="list-disc" style="margin-left: 1.5rem; padding-left: 1rem;" ><li style="margin-bottom: 0.25rem;" ><p> Maximum number of points is 10 and will be given to the tenderer with the highest total sum</p></li></ul><ul class="list-disc" style="margin-left: 1.5rem; padding-left: 1rem;" ><li style="margin-bottom: 0.25rem;" ><p>Score = 10 x Me/Mb, where Me is the total sum to evaluate and Mb is the best tender offer.</p></li></ul><p></p>

Losbezug: cmv5020vr000a06kxt2w2nk8k

The procurement is covered by the rules of the Public Procurement Act § 5b, which includes requirements for safeguarding climate and the environment in public procurement processes. The contracting authority considers that combining climate and environmental considerations as the award criterion with climate and environmental requirements in the requirement specifications gives a better climate and environmental effect than only using climate and environmental considerations as an award criterion in the competition, cf. the Public Procurement Regulations § 5b second paragraph of the third period. The contracting authority has therefore chosen to use both climate and environmental considerations as the award criteria, as well as to set minimum requirements for climate and the environment to ensure that the procurement results in the desired climate and environmental effects. Climate intensity is estimated to be very high and equivalent medium intensity for the service in the procurement for materials in the procurement. The market dialogue underpins some uncertainty connected to the market's maturity for strict minimum requirements for environmentally labelled products, emission free transport and lifetime analyses. DFØ and relevant guidelines emphasise, among other things, materials with low climate impact, long lifetime and zero emissions from transport as central measures to reduce the climate and environmental impact of the procurement. There are minimum requirements for environmental labelling of products, waste, recycling and packaging that ensure the desired climate and environmental effects connected to reduction of health and environmentally hazardous substances, sustainable materials, material efficiency and energy efficiency. At the same time, the contracting authority sees environmental excess value as tenderers are awarded for additional fulfilment of the degree of sorting, emission-free transport, environmental declaration, assessments and measures connected to reuse and reuse. These elements will therefore be evaluated as part of the award criterion Climate and Environment in the competition.

Losbezug: cmv5020vr000a06kxt2w2nk8k

<p><strong>Evaluation method Price: </strong></p><p>Maximal number of points is 10, and submitted to tenders with the lowest evaluation sum.</p><p>Score = 10 x Me/Mb, where Me is the total sum to be evaluated and Mb is the best tender.</p><p></p><p>P.1 Price: </p><p> Supplier shall register the evaluation sums for hourly rate, materials and transport as stated in the completed "Tender Form - Carpentry Services"</p><p></p><p>P.2 Annex C- Anbusskjema</p>< The completed tender form>to be uploaded in a separate annex field.</p><p></p><p>By deviations between the evaluation sums registered in the competition tool and the evaluation sums in the the uploaded tender form, the contracting authority reserves the right to use the information in the tender form for evaluation.</p>

Losbezug: cmv5020vr000a06kxt2w2nk8k

<p><strong>Evaluation of implementation ability and follow-up assignments: </strong></p><p>. Requirement 3.6 will be evaluated based on the tenderer ́s response. An overall assessment will be made where the contracting authority will give a point score on a scale from 1 to 10.</p><p></p><p>Character scale:<br>1 points - As far as fulfilled the minimum to achieve character<br>2-3 points - Very much weaker than the best offer<br>4-5 points - Much weaker than the best offer<br>6-7 points - Weaker than that best offer<br>8-9 points - Close to the best offer, but with some weaknesses<br>10 points - The best offer</p>

Losbezug: cmv5022k0002h06kxpjhe4qoh

<p><strong>Evaluation method Price: </strong></p><p>Maximal number of points is 10, and submitted to tenders with the lowest evaluation sum.</p><p>Score = 10 x Me/Mb, where Me is the total sum to be evaluated and Mb is the best tender.</p><p></p><p>P.1 Price: </p><p> Supplier shall register the evaluation sums for hourly rate, materials and transport as stated in the completed "Tender Form - Carpentry Services"</p><p></p><p>P.2 Annex C- Anbusskjema</p>< The completed tender form>to be uploaded in a separate annex field.</p><p></p><p>By deviations between the evaluation sums registered in the competition tool and the evaluation sums in the the uploaded tender form, the contracting authority reserves the right to use the information in the tender form for evaluation.</p>

Losbezug: cmv5022k0002h06kxpjhe4qoh

<p><strong>Evaluation emission free transport: </strong><br>It is the share of emission free vehicles and the period (the time) these will be used in the fixed contract period of 2 years, which will form the basis of the points determination.<br>Man a maximum of 10 points can be achieved on this environmental criterion. This can only be achieved if the tenderer only uses emission-free vehicles in the first 2 contract years.</p><p>For further information on the evaluation of the criteria, See the Annex - List of vehicles that the tenderer achieves will not be normalised.>< < </p><p>><br></p><p><strong>Evalence and reuse: </strong></p><p>Use and reuse will be evaluated based on the tenderer ́s response. An overall assessment will be made where the contracting authority will give a score on a scale from 1 to 10.<br></p><p>Character scale for assessing reuse and reuse:<br>1 points - As far as fulfilled the minimum to achieve character<br>2-3 points - Very much weaker than the best offer<br>4-5 points - Much weaker than the best offer<br>6-7 points - Weaker than the best offer<br>8-9 points - Close to the best offer, But with some weaknesses<br>10 points - The best tender</p><p><br></p><p><strong>Evalence degree of sorting:</strong></p><p>The supplier who offers a 100% sorting degree will get 10 points. The tenderer who only offers the minimum requirement of 75% will get 0 points. <br><br>Contractors will get points according to the following formula: Score = 10p x (See-75)/25 <br>what See is the degree of sorting that the tenderer offers.</p><p><><p><p><pbr></p><p><strong>Evaluation of environmental declarations (EPD):</strong></p><p>Products with approved EPD will be multiplied by the estimated annual volume, and then summed to a total sum.</p><ul class="list-disc" style="margin-left: 1.5rem; padding-left: 1rem;" ><li style="margin-bottom: 0.25rem;" ><p> Maximum number of points is 10 and will be given to the tenderer with the highest total sum</p></li></ul><ul class="list-disc" style="margin-left: 1.5rem; padding-left: 1rem;" ><li style="margin-bottom: 0.25rem;" ><p>Score = 10 x Me/Mb, where Me is the total sum to evaluate and Mb is the best tender offer.</p></li></ul><p></p>

Losbezug: cmv5022k0002h06kxpjhe4qoh

The procurement is covered by the rules of the Public Procurement Act § 5b, which includes requirements for safeguarding climate and the environment in public procurement processes. The contracting authority considers that combining climate and environmental considerations as the award criterion with climate and environmental requirements in the requirement specifications gives a better climate and environmental effect than only using climate and environmental considerations as an award criterion in the competition, cf. the Public Procurement Regulations § 5b second paragraph of the third period. The contracting authority has therefore chosen to use both climate and environmental considerations as the award criteria, as well as to set minimum requirements for climate and the environment to ensure that the procurement results in the desired climate and environmental effects. Climate intensity is estimated to be very high and equivalent medium intensity for the service in the procurement for materials in the procurement. The market dialogue underpins some uncertainty connected to the market's maturity for strict minimum requirements for environmentally labelled products, emission free transport and lifetime analyses. DFØ and relevant guidelines emphasise, among other things, materials with low climate impact, long lifetime and zero emissions from transport as central measures to reduce the climate and environmental impact of the procurement. There are minimum requirements for environmental labelling of products, waste, recycling and packaging that ensure the desired climate and environmental effects connected to reduction of health and environmentally hazardous substances, sustainable materials, material efficiency and energy efficiency. At the same time, the contracting authority sees environmental excess value as tenderers are awarded for additional fulfilment of the degree of sorting, emission-free transport, environmental declaration, assessments and measures connected to reuse and reuse. These elements will therefore be evaluated as part of the award criterion Climate and Environment in the competition.

Losbezug: cmv5022k0002h06kxpjhe4qoh

<p><strong>Evaluation of implementation ability and follow-up assignments: </strong></p><p>. Requirement 3.6 will be evaluated based on the tenderer ́s response. An overall assessment will be made where the contracting authority will give a point score on a scale from 1 to 10.</p><p></p><p>Character scale:<br>1 points - As far as fulfilled the minimum to achieve character<br>2-3 points - Very much weaker than the best offer<br>4-5 points - Much weaker than the best offer<br>6-7 points - Weaker than that best offer<br>8-9 points - Close to the best offer, but with some weaknesses<br>10 points - The best offer</p>

Losbezug: cmv50245r004o06kxldnq8y41

<p><strong>Evaluation emission free transport: </strong><br>It is the share of emission free vehicles and the period (the time) these will be used in the fixed contract period of 2 years, which will form the basis of the points determination.<br>Man a maximum of 10 points can be achieved on this environmental criterion. This can only be achieved if the tenderer only uses emission-free vehicles in the first 2 contract years.</p><p>For further information on the evaluation of the criteria, See the Annex - List of vehicles that the tenderer achieves will not be normalised.>< < </p><p>><br></p><p><strong>Evalence and reuse: </strong></p><p>Use and reuse will be evaluated based on the tenderer ́s response. An overall assessment will be made where the contracting authority will give a score on a scale from 1 to 10.<br></p><p>Character scale for assessing reuse and reuse:<br>1 points - As far as fulfilled the minimum to achieve character<br>2-3 points - Very much weaker than the best offer<br>4-5 points - Much weaker than the best offer<br>6-7 points - Weaker than the best offer<br>8-9 points - Close to the best offer, But with some weaknesses<br>10 points - The best tender</p><p><br></p><p><strong>Evalence degree of sorting:</strong></p><p>The supplier who offers a 100% sorting degree will get 10 points. The tenderer who only offers the minimum requirement of 75% will get 0 points. <br><br>Contractors will get points according to the following formula: Score = 10p x (See-75)/25 <br>what See is the degree of sorting that the tenderer offers.</p><p><><p><p><pbr></p><p><strong>Evaluation of environmental declarations (EPD):</strong></p><p>Products with approved EPD will be multiplied by the estimated annual volume, and then summed to a total sum.</p><ul class="list-disc" style="margin-left: 1.5rem; padding-left: 1rem;" ><li style="margin-bottom: 0.25rem;" ><p> Maximum number of points is 10 and will be given to the tenderer with the highest total sum</p></li></ul><ul class="list-disc" style="margin-left: 1.5rem; padding-left: 1rem;" ><li style="margin-bottom: 0.25rem;" ><p>Score = 10 x Me/Mb, where Me is the total sum to evaluate and Mb is the best tender offer.</p></li></ul><p></p>

Losbezug: cmv50245r004o06kxldnq8y41

The procurement is covered by the rules of the Public Procurement Act § 5b, which includes requirements for safeguarding climate and the environment in public procurement processes. The contracting authority considers that combining climate and environmental considerations as the award criterion with climate and environmental requirements in the requirement specifications gives a better climate and environmental effect than only using climate and environmental considerations as an award criterion in the competition, cf. the Public Procurement Regulations § 5b second paragraph of the third period. The contracting authority has therefore chosen to use both climate and environmental considerations as the award criteria, as well as to set minimum requirements for climate and the environment to ensure that the procurement results in the desired climate and environmental effects. Climate intensity is estimated to be very high and equivalent medium intensity for the service in the procurement for materials in the procurement. The market dialogue underpins some uncertainty connected to the market's maturity for strict minimum requirements for environmentally labelled products, emission free transport and lifetime analyses. DFØ and relevant guidelines emphasise, among other things, materials with low climate impact, long lifetime and zero emissions from transport as central measures to reduce the climate and environmental impact of the procurement. There are minimum requirements for environmental labelling of products, waste, recycling and packaging that ensure the desired climate and environmental effects connected to reduction of health and environmentally hazardous substances, sustainable materials, material efficiency and energy efficiency. At the same time, the contracting authority sees environmental excess value as tenderers are awarded for additional fulfilment of the degree of sorting, emission-free transport, environmental declaration, assessments and measures connected to reuse and reuse. These elements will therefore be evaluated as part of the award criterion Climate and Environment in the competition.

Losbezug: cmv50245r004o06kxldnq8y41

<p><strong>Evaluation method Price: </strong></p><p>Maximal number of points is 10, and submitted to tenders with the lowest evaluation sum.</p><p>Score = 10 x Me/Mb, where Me is the total sum to be evaluated and Mb is the best tender.</p><p></p><p>P.1 Price: </p><p> Supplier shall register the evaluation sums for hourly rate, materials and transport as stated in the completed "Tender Form - Carpentry Services"</p><p></p><p>P.2 Annex C- Anbusskjema</p>< The completed tender form>to be uploaded in a separate annex field.</p><p></p><p>By deviations between the evaluation sums registered in the competition tool and the evaluation sums in the the uploaded tender form, the contracting authority reserves the right to use the information in the tender form for evaluation.</p>

Losbezug: cmv50245r004o06kxldnq8y41

<p><strong>Evaluation method Price: </strong></p><p>Maximal number of points is 10, and submitted to tenders with the lowest evaluation sum.</p><p>Score = 10 x Me/Mb, where Me is the total sum to be evaluated and Mb is the best tender.</p><p></p><p>P.1 Price: </p><p> Supplier shall register the evaluation sums for hourly rate, materials and transport as stated in the completed "Tender Form - Carpentry Services"</p><p></p><p>P.2 Annex C- Anbusskjema</p>< The completed tender form>to be uploaded in a separate annex field.</p><p></p><p>By deviations between the evaluation sums registered in the competition tool and the evaluation sums in the the uploaded tender form, the contracting authority reserves the right to use the information in the tender form for evaluation.</p>

Losbezug: cmv5025rp006v06kxpy97xaz9

<p><strong>Evaluation emission free transport: </strong><br>It is the share of emission free vehicles and the period (the time) these will be used in the fixed contract period of 2 years, which will form the basis of the points determination.<br>Man a maximum of 10 points can be achieved on this environmental criterion. This can only be achieved if the tenderer only uses emission-free vehicles in the first 2 contract years.</p><p>For further information on the evaluation of the criteria, See the Annex - List of vehicles that the tenderer achieves will not be normalised.>< < </p><p>><br></p><p><strong>Evalence and reuse: </strong></p><p>Use and reuse will be evaluated based on the tenderer ́s response. An overall assessment will be made where the contracting authority will give a score on a scale from 1 to 10.<br></p><p>Character scale for assessing reuse and reuse:<br>1 points - As far as fulfilled the minimum to achieve character<br>2-3 points - Very much weaker than the best offer<br>4-5 points - Much weaker than the best offer<br>6-7 points - Weaker than the best offer<br>8-9 points - Close to the best offer, But with some weaknesses<br>10 points - The best tender</p><p><br></p><p><strong>Evalence degree of sorting:</strong></p><p>The supplier who offers a 100% sorting degree will get 10 points. The tenderer who only offers the minimum requirement of 75% will get 0 points. <br><br>Contractors will get points according to the following formula: Score = 10p x (See-75)/25 <br>what See is the degree of sorting that the tenderer offers.</p><p><><p><p><pbr></p><p><strong>Evaluation of environmental declarations (EPD):</strong></p><p>Products with approved EPD will be multiplied by the estimated annual volume, and then summed to a total sum.</p><ul class="list-disc" style="margin-left: 1.5rem; padding-left: 1rem;" ><li style="margin-bottom: 0.25rem;" ><p> Maximum number of points is 10 and will be given to the tenderer with the highest total sum</p></li></ul><ul class="list-disc" style="margin-left: 1.5rem; padding-left: 1rem;" ><li style="margin-bottom: 0.25rem;" ><p>Score = 10 x Me/Mb, where Me is the total sum to evaluate and Mb is the best tender offer.</p></li></ul><p></p>

Losbezug: cmv5025rp006v06kxpy97xaz9

The procurement is covered by the rules of the Public Procurement Act § 5b, which includes requirements for safeguarding climate and the environment in public procurement processes. The contracting authority considers that combining climate and environmental considerations as the award criterion with climate and environmental requirements in the requirement specifications gives a better climate and environmental effect than only using climate and environmental considerations as an award criterion in the competition, cf. the Public Procurement Regulations § 5b second paragraph of the third period. The contracting authority has therefore chosen to use both climate and environmental considerations as the award criteria, as well as to set minimum requirements for climate and the environment to ensure that the procurement results in the desired climate and environmental effects. Climate intensity is estimated to be very high and equivalent medium intensity for the service in the procurement for materials in the procurement. The market dialogue underpins some uncertainty connected to the market's maturity for strict minimum requirements for environmentally labelled products, emission free transport and lifetime analyses. DFØ and relevant guidelines emphasise, among other things, materials with low climate impact, long lifetime and zero emissions from transport as central measures to reduce the climate and environmental impact of the procurement. There are minimum requirements for environmental labelling of products, waste, recycling and packaging that ensure the desired climate and environmental effects connected to reduction of health and environmentally hazardous substances, sustainable materials, material efficiency and energy efficiency. At the same time, the contracting authority sees environmental excess value as tenderers are awarded for additional fulfilment of the degree of sorting, emission-free transport, environmental declaration, assessments and measures connected to reuse and reuse. These elements will therefore be evaluated as part of the award criterion Climate and Environment in the competition.

Losbezug: cmv5025rp006v06kxpy97xaz9

<p><strong>Evaluation of implementation ability and follow-up assignments: </strong></p><p>. Requirement 3.6 will be evaluated based on the tenderer ́s response. An overall assessment will be made where the contracting authority will give a point score on a scale from 1 to 10.</p><p></p><p>Character scale:<br>1 points - As far as fulfilled the minimum to achieve character<br>2-3 points - Very much weaker than the best offer<br>4-5 points - Much weaker than the best offer<br>6-7 points - Weaker than that best offer<br>8-9 points - Close to the best offer, but with some weaknesses<br>10 points - The best offer</p>

Losbezug: cmv5025rp006v06kxpy97xaz9