Framework agreement for strategic workplace development and needs analysis.

Eiendoms - og byfornysetaten would like to enter into a framework agreement with consultants on strategic workplace development, need analyses and preparation of requirement specifications when procuring new office premises. The aim of the contract is to ensure that the municipality achieves future orientated, area efficient and user adapted local systems that support the entities ́needs, the municipality's objectives and principles for good land utilisation. Tenderers shall be able to assist throughout the entire early phase up until the new hire contract is signed, or any extension of the existing contract. The framework agreement can be used by the Agency for Real Estate and Urban Renewal and other districts, departments and entities that are included in Oslo municipality as a legal entity. The Agency for Real Estate and Urban Renewal (EBY) is the contract owner and is responsible for overall management and follow-up of the framework agreement. EBY shall contribute to uniform and correct use of the contract across Oslo municipality, follow-up call-off practice, obtain and compile reports and follow-up and manage conditions that can affect the framework agreement as a whole. The ordering company is responsible for defining a separate need, preparing an order, accepting tenders and following-up each assignment. The ordering company is the contract party in the call-off contract and is responsible for approving deliveries, invoice control and follow-up of any deviations or breaches in the assignment. The ordering company will, if needed, inform the Agency for Real Estate and Urban Renewal of significant deviations, breaches or other conditions that may affect the overall management of the framework agreement.

CPV-Code

79411100

Angebotsfrist

14. Dez 2026, 12:00

The tenderer shall be a legally established company. Documentation requirements: Norwegian companies: Company Registration Certificate. Foreign companies: Proof that the company is registered in a trade or business register as prescribed by the law of the country where the company is established.

Losbezug: LOT-0001

Tenderers shall have sufficient economic and financial capacity to be able to fulfil the contractual obligations throughout the contract period. The assessment will depend on a total and concrete assessment of the company's economic and financial position, including annual revenues, solidity, liquidity, profitability, payment history and economic development. Documentation requirements: Tenderers shall present the company's last two approved Annual Financial Statements with notes, as well as the board's annual reports and auditor's reports if the company is obliged to prepare or obtain such documentation. Relevant and updated documentation of the company's economic and financial position can be included in the evaluation if the documentation is suitable to give a more comprehensive picture of the company's current economic situation than the last available annual accounts. The contracting authority reserves the right to obtain credit information and publicly available accounting information about the tenderer. If a tenderer, for a justifiable reason, for example because the company is newly established, cannot submit the requested documentation, the tenderer can document its economic and financial capacity by presenting other documentation that the Contracting Authority considers suitable.

Losbezug: LOT-0001

Tenderers are required to have implemented environmental management measures that ensure that the tenderer is suitable to fulfil the contract's environmental provisions. This means that the tenderer has methods for working actively and systematically to reduce negative environmental impact from activities connected to the execution of this contract. Documentation requirements: A description of the tenderer's environmental management measures. If a tenderer has certificates from independent bodies that document the environmental management system, they can be presented as documentation. Refer to the EU Scheme for Environmental Management and Environmental Audit (EMAS), other recognised environmental management systems in regulation (EF) no. 1221/2009 article 45, or equivalent, and other environmental management standards based on relevant European or international standards from accredited bodies such as ISO 14001 or equivalent.

Losbezug: LOT-0001

Tenderers shall have a relevant quality assurance system for the content of the contract. Documentation requirements: A description of the tenderer's quality assurance methods. Alternatively: Certificate for the company's quality assurance system issued by independent bodies that confirms the tenderer fulfils certain quality assurance standards, for example ISO 9001:2015.

Losbezug: LOT-0001

Tenderers shall have good experience from comparable contracts. Comparable assignments means assignments connected to mapping and analysis of area requirements, workplace development, area efficiency, function programming, local strategy or other consultancy assignments of an equivalent character and complexity. Documentation requirements: Short description of the most important deliveries in the last three years, including information on the contract ́s value, date of delivery as well as the name of the contracting authority and a description of the assignment ́s content. If a tenderer has a justifiable reason (e.g. newly started company) of not submitting the documentation that the contracting authority has required, he can document his experience with any other document that the contracting authority deems suitable.

Losbezug: LOT-0001

Hourly rates

Losbezug: LOT-0001

Assignment comprehension

Losbezug: LOT-0001

Competence and experience

Losbezug: LOT-0001

According to the Public Procurement Act § 5 b, climate and environmental considerations shall as a main rule be weighted at least 30 percent in public procurements. The obligation does not apply if the procurement, in accordance with nature, has a climate footprint and an environmental impact that is immaterial, or if climate and environmental requirements in the requirement specifications are assessed to provide better climate and environmental effect. When assessing the exception, emphasis has been put on the nature of the services that are procured through the framework agreement. The services mainly consist of consultancy, assessments, document production and other knowledge based service provision. There is not much transport need to be expected beyond participation in occasional meetings and site inspections. The Product component in the agreement is approximately non-existent. The assessment in accordance with the Public Procurement Act § 5 b must be based on the actual procured service, including the climate and environmental impact connected to the execution of the service and its value chain. In this concrete procurement, the services are assessed in accordance with nature to have an immaterial climate footprint and an immaterial environmental impact. The assessment is connected to the consultancy and review business that is actually procured and not to any indirect effects that can later result from other decisions made on the basis of the deliveries. Based on this, the terms for exceptions are considered met. See also DFØ ́s guidelines for procurements that have immaterial climate footprint and environmental impact, as well as other case law, e.g. the KOFA cases 2024/1422 and 2025/0801.

Losbezug: LOT-0001

Is the tenderer in a bankruptcy situation? Specify why, under the mentioned circumstances, one is able to carry out the contract, considering the current national provisions and measures for continuing the business activities? It is not necessary to provide this information if rejection of tenderers in such a situation is obligatory in accordance with the current national law with no exceptions, when the tenderer is still able to carry out the contract.

Is the tenderer in a bankruptcy situation? Specify why, under the mentioned circumstances, one is able to carry out the contract, considering the current national provisions and measures for continuing the business activities? It is not necessary to provide this information if rejection of tenderers in such a situation is obligatory in accordance with the current national law with no exceptions, when the tenderer is still able to carry out the contract.

Is the tenderer himself or a person, who is a member of the tenderer's administration, management or supervisory body or has the competence to represent or control or make decisions in such bodies, by enforceable judgement been convicted of corruption by a verdict handed down not more than five years ago, or a rejection period determined directly in the judgement that still applies? Corruption as defined in Article 3 of the Convention on Combating Corruption, involving European Communities or European Union member states (EUT C 195 of 25.6.1997, s. 1), and in Article 2, point 1, in the Council ́s framework decision 2003/568/RIA of 22 July 2003 on combating corruption in the private sector (EUT L 192 of 31.7.2003, p. 54). This rejection reason also includes corruption as defined in national law for the contracting authority or supplier.

Is the supplier in a situation where he has been forced debt arrangement? Specify why, under the mentioned circumstances, one is able to carry out the contract, considering the current national provisions and measures for continuing the business activities? It is not necessary to provide this information if rejection of tenderers in such a situation is obligatory in accordance with the current national law with no exceptions, when the tenderer is still able to carry out the contract.

Is the tenderer himself or a person, who is a member of the tenderer's administration, management or supervisory body or has the competence to represent or control or make decisions in such bodies, at the time a legally convicted verdict of participation in a criminal organisation by a verdict handed down no more than five years ago, or a rejection period set out directly in the judgement that still applies? Participation in a criminal organisation as defined in Article 2 of the Council ́s framework decision 2008/841/RIA of 24 October 2008 on control of organised crime (EUT L 300 of 11.11.2008, p. 42).

Has the tenderer entered into agreement(s) with other tenderers with the intention of turning the competition?

Is the tenderer aware of breaches of environmental provisions as stated in national law, the relevant notice or procurement documents or Article 18 (2) of Directive 2014/24/EU.

Is the tenderer himself or a person, who is a member of the tenderer's administration, management or supervisory body or has the competence to represent or control or make decisions in such bodies, in the event a legal verdict has been convicted of money laundering or financing terrorism by a verdict handed down no more than five years ago, or a rejection period set out directly in the judgement that still applies? Money laundering or financing terrorism As defined in Article 1 of the European Parliament and Council Directive 2005/60/EF of 26 October 2005 on preventive measures against the use of the financial system for money laundering and financing terrorism (EUT L 309 of 25.11.2005, p. 15).

Is the tenderer himself or a person, who is a member of the tenderer's administration, management or supervisory body or has the competence to represent or control or make decisions in such bodies, at the time a legally convicted of fraud has been convicted of fraud by a verdict handed down not more than five years ago, or a rejection period determined directly in the judgement that still applies? Fraud included in Article 1 of the Convention on protection of the Financial Interests of the European Communities (EFT C 316 of 27.11.1995, p. 48).

Is the tenderer himself or a person, who is a member of the tenderer's administration, management or supervisory body or has the competence to represent or control or make decisions in such bodies, in the event a legal verdict has been convicted of child labour and other forms of human trafficking by a verdict handed down no more than five years ago, or a rejection period determined directly in the judgement that still applies? Child labour and other forms of human trafficking as defined in Article 2 of the European Parliament and council directive 2011/36/EU of 5. 1 April 2011 on the prevention and control of human trafficking and the protection of its victims and for compensation of the Council ́s framework decision 2002/629/RIA (EUT L 101 of 15.4.2011, p. 1).

Is the tenderer in an insolvency situation? Specify why, under the mentioned circumstances, one is able to carry out the contract, considering the current national provisions and measures for continuing the business activities? It is not necessary to provide this information if rejection of tenderers in such a situation is obligatory in accordance with the current national law with no exceptions, when the tenderer is still able to carry out the contract.

Is the tenderer aware of breaches of provisions on working conditions as stated in national law, the relevant notice or procurement documents or Article 18 (2) of Directive 2014/24/EU.

Specify why, under the mentioned circumstances, one is able to carry out the contract, considering the current national provisions and measures for continuing the business activities? It is not necessary to provide this information if rejection of tenderers in such a situation is obligatory in accordance with the current national law with no exceptions, when the tenderer is still able to carry out the contract.

Has the tenderer: a) given grossly incorrect information with the notification of the information required to verify that there is no basis for rejection, or of the qualification requirements being fulfilled, b) failed to provide such information, c) made reservations immediately to present the supporting documents requested by the contracting authority, or d) improperly affected the contracting authority ́s decision process to acquire confidential information that could give this an unlawful advantage in connection with competition, or negligently has given misleading information that can have a significant influence on decisions on rejection, selection or award?

Is the tenderer aware of a conflict of interest as stated in national law, the relevant notice or procurement documents?

Has the tenderer or an entity associated with the supplier advised the contracting authority or in another way been involved in the planning of the competition?

Has the tenderer committed serious errors in professional practice? If relevant, see the definitions in national law, the relevant notice or procurement documents.

Has the tenderer committed significant breaches of contract in connection with the fulfilment of a previous public contract, a previous contract with a public contracting authority or a previous concession contract, where the breach has led to the cancellation of the contract, compensation or other similar sanctions?

Is the tenderer aware of breaches of provisions on social conditions as stated in national law, the relevant notice or procurement documents or Article 18 (2) of Directive 2014/24/EU.

Have tenderers failed to fulfil all their social security obligations in the country where they are established and in their member state, if this is a different country than what he is established in?

Specify why, under the mentioned circumstances, one is able to carry out the contract, considering the current national provisions and measures for continuing the business activities? It is not necessary to provide this information if rejection of tenderers in such a situation is obligatory in accordance with the current national law with no exceptions, when the tenderer is still able to carry out the contract.

Has the tenderer not fulfilled all of his tax and duty obligations in both the country where he is established and in the contracting authority's member state, if this is a different country than what he is established in?

Is the tenderer himself or a person, who is a member of the tenderer's administration, management or supervisory body, or has the competence to represent or control or make decisions in such bodies, in the event a legal verdict has been convicted of acts of terrorism or criminal acts connected to terrorist activities by a verdict handed down no more than five years ago, or a rejection period set directly in the judgement that still applies? Acts of terrorism or criminal acts relating to terrorist activity as defined in Article 1 and 3 of the Council ́s framework decision 2002/475/RIA of 13 June 2002 on combating terrorism (EFT L 164, af 22.6.2002, p. 3). This rejection reason also includes incitement to, participation or attempts to commit such actions as included in Article 4 in the mentioned framework decision.

Is the tenderer himself or a person, who is a member of the tenderer's administration, management or supervisory body, or has the competence to represent or control or make decisions in such bodies, have been legally convicted of offences regarding professional behaviour in defence procurements?

Is the tenderer assessed to lack the reliability necessary to exclude the risk of national security?

The contracting authority shall state that in Norway there are national rejection reasons. These shall be described in the procurement documents. Tenderers must respond to whether they are in one or more of the situations described in the national rejection reasons.