FX Tender - Concession

This tender represents an opportunity to appoint a new operator to 3 units in CPH and reshape the future foreign exchange proposition. Together, these locations provide direct access to the concession's two primary customer groups and offer exposure to some of the airport's most commercially attractive passenger flows. CPH’s objective is to establish a commercially sustainable and customer-focused business model that reflects changing passenger needs, evolving payment trends, and the continued growth and development of the airport.

CPV-Code

66180000

Geschätzter Wert

1.800.000.000 DKK

It is a minimum requirement that the tenderer provides at least two (2) references relating to comparable business activities. For the purposes of this requirement, a reference will be considered comparable only if it concerns the operation of currency exchange services at an airport handling more than 10 million passengers annually. The references (operator statement only) must relate to contracts that have been carried out during the two (2) years preceding the tender deadline. Ongoing contracts may be relied upon, provided that the contract has been performed for at least twelve (12) months prior to the tender deadline. The reference requirement can be fulfilled through references where the tenderer has been a supplier or subcontractor. The decisive factor is that the tenderer has performed the work covered by the reference. The references must be described in the ESPD and include the following information: - Short description of the references - The airports and the number of total annual passengers in 2025 - Date of opening of the premises - Contact person from each contracting entity CPH reserves the right to contact the contracting entity in question to verify the existence of the reference. Please note that a tenderer may in its ESPD state only its own references, i.e. for the specific legal entity (e.g. company) in question. This means for example that group companies' references may be taken into account only if the tenderer relies on the group companies in question in relation to suitability and if separate ESPDs and letters of commitment are submitted for these group companies, see below. As for consortia, the consortium members combined must meet the minimum requirement. As for tenderers relying on the technical and professional suitability of other economic operators, the tenderer and the committed entity combined must meet the minimum requirement.

Losbezug: FX Tender

The economic operator must complete and submit Annex A (Financial offer). All blanks marked yellow in Annex A must be filled out by the tenderer. Annex A constitutes the tenderer’s combined financial offer across all locations. The offered concession fee and minimum annual rent (per IDP) will be applicable across all units. The overall assessment of “Financial” is based on the two (2) sub-sub-criteria described above and is calculated with two decimal places. The sub-sub-criteria are evaluated separately. No indexation is applied for evaluation purposes. All prices must be quoted in Danish kroner (DKK) excluding VAT (but including any other indirect taxes). “Concession fee (%)” (50%) The tenderer must state the offered concession fee percentage in Annex A (Financial offer), the offered concession fee (%) for both sales and purchase of currencies. When assessing “Concession fee (%)”, emphasis will be placed on as high a value as possible. CPH will use a scoring system in which the concession fee is translated into scores ranging from a minimum of 0 points to a maximum of 10 points: • The tenderer offering the highest concession fee will achieve the maximum score of 10 points. • An offered concession fee percentage lower than 2,35% will gain a score of 0 points. • All other tenderers will be scored based on a linear interpolation between these two values. • If all tenderers submit identical concession fees, all tenderers will be awarded 10 points. “Minimum annual rent (per IDP)” (50%) The tenderer must state the offered minimum annual rent (per IDP) for all units in Annex A (Financial Offer), which will be adjusted in accordance with the lease agreement. The minimum annual rent (per IDP) for each unit will serve as the minimum guaranteed payment to CPH. For evaluation purposes, the minimum annual rent (per IDP) is calculated as the sum of the minimum annual rent (per IDP) offered for all locations. The estimated IDP in the Financial offer (Annex A) for the lease period, provided by CPH, is not binding. When assessing “Minimum annual rent (per IDP)”, emphasis will be placed on as high a minimum annual rent per IDP as possible. The minimum annual rent per IDP must be quoted in Danish kroner (DKK) excl. VAT (but including any other indirect taxes, duties etc.) CPH will use a scoring system in which the minimum annual rent (per IDP) are translated into scores ranging from a minimum of 0 points to a maximum of 10 points: • The tenderer offering the highest minimum annual rent (per IDP) will achieve the maximum score of 10 points. • An offered minimum annual rent lower than 0,70 DKK per IDP will gain a score of 0 points. • All other tenderers will be scored based on a linear interpolation between these two values. • If all tenderers submit identical minimum annual rents (per IDP), all tenderers will be awarded 10 points.

Losbezug: FX Tender

The overall assessment of quality is based on the following sub-sub-criteria and is calculated with two decimal places. Sub-sub-criterion “Concept” (50%) The proposal will be evaluated on the overall strength of the store concept, including the ability to deliver a well-executed portfolio of stores with a relevant value proposition for travelers, clearly defined roles, and store design and layout that create a high-quality shopping experience, a high-quality, durable, and sustainable design solution, fit-in with the overall CPH design and deliver strong commercial performance. Pricing must be clearly and unambiguously displayed. Sub-sub-criterion “Business plan” (50%) The assessment of Business plan will focus on: Setup: The proposal will be evaluated on the overall strength of the CPH setup, including the ability to deliver a robust organizational set up, reliable and high performing units, that drives a strong commercial result. Viability of business plan: The viability of the business plan will be evaluated on how the submitted description demonstrates an ability to operate sustainable and commercially sound units at CPH, and on how convincingly intended investments and key operational and cost drivers support the brand experience and commercial performance.

Losbezug: FX Tender

Has the economic operator itself or any person who is a member of its administrative, management or supervisory body or has powers of representation, decision or control therein been the subject of a conviction by final judgment for corruption, by a conviction rendered at the most five years ago or in which an exclusion period set out directly in the conviction continues to be applicable? As defined in Article 3 of the Convention on the fight against corruption involving officials of the European Communities or officials of Member States of the European Union, OJ C 195, 25.6.1997, p. 1, and in Article 2(1) of Council Framework Decision 2003/568/JHA of 22 July 2003 on combating corruption in the private sector (OJ L 192, 31.7.2003, p. 54). This exclusion ground also includes corruption as defined in the national law of the contracting authority (contracting entity) or the economic operator

Has the economic operator itself or any person who is a member of its administrative, management or supervisory body or has powers of representation, decision or control therein been the subject of a conviction by final judgment for fraud, by a conviction rendered at the most five years ago or in which an exclusion period set out directly in the conviction continues to be applicable? Within the meaning of Article 1 of the Convention on the protection of the European Communities' financial interests (OJ C 316, 27.11.1995, p. 48).

Has the economic operator itself or any person who is a member of its administrative, management or supervisory body or has powers of representation, decision or control therein been the subject of a conviction by final judgment for money laundering or terrorist financing, by a conviction rendered at the most five years ago or in which an exclusion period set out directly in the conviction continues to be applicable? As defined in Article 1 of Directive 2005/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 October 2005 on the prevention of the use of the financial system for the purpose of money laundering and terrorist financing (OJ L 309, 25.11.2005, p. 15).

Has the economic operator itself or any person who is a member of its administrative, management or supervisory body or has powers of representation, decision or control therein been the subject of a conviction by final judgment for participation in a criminal organisation, by a conviction rendered at the most five years ago or in which an exclusion period set out directly in the conviction continues to be applicable? As defined in Article 2 of Council Framework Decision 2008/841/JHA of 24 October 2008 on the fight against organised crime (OJ L 300, 11.11.2008, p. 42).

Has the economic operator itself or any person who is a member of its administrative, management or supervisory body or has powers of representation, decision or control therein been the subject of a conviction by final judgment for terrorist offences or offences linked to terrorist activities, by a conviction rendered at the most five years ago or in which an exclusion period set out directly in the conviction continues to be applicable? As defined in Articles 1 and 3 of Council Framework Decision of 13 June 2002 on combating terrorism (OJ L 164, 22.6.2002, p. 3). This exclusion ground also includes inciting or aiding or abetting or attempting to commit an offence, as referred to in Article 4 of that Framework Decision.

Has the economic operator itself or any person who is a member of its administrative, management or supervisory body or has powers of representation, decision or control therein been the subject of a conviction by final judgment for child labour and other forms of trafficking in human beings, by a conviction rendered at the most five years ago or in which an exclusion period set out directly in the conviction continues to be applicable? As defined in Article 2 of Directive 2011/36/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 April 2011 on preventing and combating trafficking in human beings and protecting its victims, and replacing Council Framework Decision 2002/629/JHA (OJ L 101, 15.4.2011, p. 1).

Is the economic operator guilty of grave professional misconduct? Where applicable, see definitions in national law, the relevant notice or the procurement documents.

Can the economic operator confirm that:a) It has been guilty of serious misrepresentation in supplying the information required for the verification of the absence of grounds for exclusion or the fulfilment of the selection criteria,b) It has withheld such information,c) It has not been able, without delay, to submit the supporting documents required by a contracting authority or contracting entity, andd) It has undertaken to unduly influence the decision making process of the contracting authority or contracting entity, to obtain confidential information that may confer upon it undue advantages in the procurement procedure or to negligently provide misleading information that may have a material influence on decisions concerning exclusion, selection or award?

Is the economic operator aware of any conflict of interest, as indicated in national law, the relevant notice or the procurement documents due to its participation in the procurement procedure?

Has the economic operator or an undertaking related to it advised the contracting authority or contracting entity or otherwise been involved in the preparation of the procurement procedure?

Has the economic operator breached its obligations relating to the payment social security contributions, both in the country in which it is established and in Member State of the contracting authority or contracting entity if other than the country of establishment?

Has the economic operator breached its obligations relating to the payment of taxes, both in the country in which it is established and in Member State of the contracting authority or contracting entity if other than the country of establishment?